WK25- 3WAY: daveDILLY (5-5) vs faQEyeReddit (0-1) vs EyeDealIstic (1-1) (FAQ WINS)

[miracle]

Regular Battle
Punches due NO DUE DATES
Voting ends on NO DUE DATES

Rebuttal Option

both competitors must agree to it at time of check-in
format is A, B, B, A (A posts first, B drops next, B posts follow-up, A drops final bar)

You have 24hrs from when battle was set to agree on rebuttal battle


You know the rules, if not, refer to the rule thread.

first to 4 wins
3-0 is a KO

Each battler only gets to post 1 bar
So pick a person to diss or diss both
But u only get to post 1


@FaQEyeReddit
@daveDILLY
@EyeDealIstic

[FaQEyeReddit]

Walla-he tried to grow here but dont connect, Dave beard no merit, so I aim at his neck..
it’s a major-let down when you got to present, ya self to a professional and cant do it through text..

[daveDILLY]

i push hard & persevere. - its all creative shit that I spew..
wen lookin 4 wackness u’ll find these two in the middle - like the word outwork & thats exactly wat ill do

[EyeDealIstic]

Not once in my life have I ever even inferred I want to be in a 3 way with two other dudes.
I shall go back in time and convince all of your past male lovers (both real and artificial lifeform) to not make love to thine buttocks!

[MV]

v/FaqEyeReddit
EyeDealIstic was rambling insults. funny but not a punch. dave had a good concept but im not a fan of how it was executed "these two in the middle" "outwork". i mean two is in the middle but the "these two" throws the punch off for me as you didnt really use this as a component for your punch. I feel that the detour you took to your punch cost the effectiveness to decrease.
Faq your punctuation in the punch made the read a bit off, but all in all i thought it was humous and slick in how it was presented.
this came down between Faq and dave imo. Dave had a punch that turned more into a statement at the conclusion, while Faq had a statementish-diss. i went with faq because as i read dave's punch through to the end it felt like it was hampered by the climax, while Faq's was the opposite as it ended with clever wording. GG gents

[Slayerr.]

I think faq had a better structured verse this time and has got the hang of how it should be done, the flip it’s self was bland and “can’t do it through text” fell a bit flat for me. Dave’s punch I just really didn’t think worked. It was very wordy and not very clever either, we all know Dave’s capeable of much better he prolly thought this would get him past the line but I disagree I really didn’t like it.
V/faq

[Lady Poet]

all Punchlines need more complexity
Vote-faq for a better attempt

[miracle]

3-0 faq wins